top of page
Search

Building an Agent Register: the simplest safety net for agentic AI at work

What is an Agent Register

An Agent Register is a single source of truth for every AI helper in your organisation—who owns it, what it’s allowed to do, and the guardrails around it. If you only do one thing to de-risk agents this quarter, do this. Think of it like a staff directory meets a permissions list.



Why you need one

Without it, “helpful” agents can quietly grow in number, scope, and risk. With it, leaders can answer—at a glance—who runs each agent, why it exists, what data it can touch, and when a human must approve sensitive tasks.


The 10 essential fields

  1. Agent name – make it human-readable (e.g., “FinanceBot – Payroll Reports”).

  2. Business purpose – one sentence: what outcome does it deliver?

  3. Owner (person & team) – who is accountable day-to-day.

  4. Data it can access – simple levels: Public / Internal / Sensitive.

  5. Allowed actions – read, create, update, export (be explicit about export).

  6. Where it can send outputs – email groups, folders, systems (name them).

  7. Hand-offs – can it ask other agents for help? If yes, which ones and for what.

  8. When a human must approve – e.g., any export from Sensitive data, or any cross-agent hand-off.

  9. Logging coverage – confirm it records who asked, what plan it made, what tool it used, and how many records it touched.

  10. Lifecycle & review – Pilot / Production / Retired; last review date; next review date.


Nice-to-have: model/vendor, version, hosting location, service account ID, risk rating (Low/Med/High).



A quick example entry

  • Agent name: FinanceBot – Payroll Reports

  • Business purpose: Sends a monthly headcount summary to Finance.

  • Owner: Pat Lee (Finance Ops)

  • Data: Internal (HRIS summary tables only)

  • Allowed actions: Read HRIS summary; no export of full payroll; email Finance-Metrics list only

  • Hand-offs: May ask TriageBot to tidy CSVs; may not ask FinOps to run exports

  • Human approval required: Any request touching Sensitive data or any new recipient

  • Logging: Plans + tool calls + recipients recorded; row counts captured

  • Lifecycle & review: Production; reviewed 2026-02-01; next review 2026-05-01


How to stand this up in one week:


Day 1–2: Inventory.

Ask each team to list the agents they use in three bullets: name, purpose, owner.


Day 3–4: Fill the 10 fields.

Keep wording simple; if a field feels “too technical,” rephrase it in business terms.


Day 5: Add two guardrails.

  • Any export from Sensitive data requires a human click.

  • Any agent-to-agent hand-off must be structured (no free-text messages).


Day 6–7: Review & publish.

Share the register internally; add a monthly 30-minute review with owners to keep it fresh.



Red flags your register should reveal

  • Agents with no clear owner.

  • Agents that can export data but have no approval step.

  • Agents that can message other agents freely (no structure).

  • Outputs going to broad email lists “just in case.”

  • “Temporary pilots” that somehow became permanent.


Who does what

  • Executives: approve the policy that every agent must be in the register before use.

  • Managers: keep your team’s entries current; review them quarterly.

  • Front-line staff: request changes via a simple form (“we need this agent to email Vendor X—why?”).

  • IT/Security: enforce the two guardrails above and make sure logs tell the story, not just the outcome.


Keep it aligned (lightweight, not bureaucratic)

If you already follow frameworks like NIST (govern → map → measure → manage) or draw on MITRE scenarios or the “excessive agency” theme in OWASP, your Agent Register is where those ideas become one page of practical reality.

 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

Become a sponsor

The benefits of sponsorship include research into an insider risk management issue relevant to your organization and developing the risk mitigation practitioners and researchers of tomorrow.

¹Our founding partners provide the CInRM CoE with dedicated annual funding to support our operations and research initiatives, in addition to being strategic advisors in establishing the wider Canadian community of practice.

²Our Tier 1 partners provide the CInRM CoE with dedicated annual funding to support our operations and research initiatives, in addition to being active collaborators on our key initiatives to develop cross-industry capabilities for the wider Canadian community of practice.

³Our Tier 2 partners provide the CInRM CoE with dedicated annual funding to support our operations and research initiatives.

⁴Our partners provide the CInRM CoE with ad-hoc:
a) facilitation of dialogue with industry stakeholders;
b) fostering awareness of the CInRM CoE;
c) in-kind support; and/or,
d) sponsorship.

⁵The Federal Advisory Committee provides support and guidance to the CInRM CoE's operations concerning:

a) academic research initiatives;

b) program development; and,

c) operations;

to enhance the quality of the CInRM CoE and promote best practices in Canadian InRM.

*The CInRM CoE encourages diverse opinions concerning the mitigation of insider threats and the fostering of critical discourse.  Points-of-view (POV) represent the perspectives of our occasional contributors and may not be representative of the CInRM CoE.

Desk

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

Follow Us On:

  • LinkedIn

© 2026 by Canadian Insider Risk Management Centre of Excellence | Centre d'excellence canadien pour la gestion des risques internes

bottom of page